What common pitfall should be avoided when elaborating requirements?

When elaborating requirements, it's crucial to avoid the assumption that they are always correct. This pitfall can lead to significant issues in software development and project management. Each requirement should be scrutinized and validated continuously through discussions with stakeholders and team members. If one assumes that requirements are accurate without questioning or verifying them, it can result in building features or functionalities that do not meet user needs or solve the actual problems.

Moreover, assumptions might cause miscommunication between the development team and stakeholders, potentially leading to project delays, budget overruns, or missing essential components. Emphasizing a critical examination of requirements helps ensure that they are not only accurate but also aligned with the overarching goals of the project. This approach ultimately leads to a more successful implementation of solutions that better serve users and stakeholders.

In contrast, identifying solutions after understanding the problem, asking detailed questions, and involving multiple stakeholders are all practices that enhance the requirement-gathering process, encouraging a thorough understanding of the context and needs involved.